Critical Literacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Literature Review on Strengthening Academic Reading and Writing Skills in Indonesian Language Instruction

Authors

  • ELMIWATI ELMIWATI Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Tanjungpinang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23880684

Keywords:

critical literacy, artificial intelligence, academic reading, academic writing, Indonesian language learning

Abstract

Advances in generative artificial intelligence present both opportunities and challenges in the learning of the Indonesian language, particularly with regard to the ability to evaluate information and produce academically sound writing. This study aims to analyse the role of critical literacy as a foundation for strengthening academic reading skills and to synthesise strategies for its integration with artificial intelligence to support academic writing skills. The study employs a literature review method using a descriptive-qualitative approach through the examination of scientific articles, academic books and relevant policy documents. The results of the synthesis indicate that critical literacy provides a conceptual framework for understanding texts, evaluating the credibility of sources, examining the relationship between claims and evidence, recognising bias, and comparing perspectives. In academic writing, the integration of critical literacy and artificial intelligence is directed towards the development of ideas, the structuring of arguments, the evaluation of feedback, the verification of references, and reflective revision, whilst maintaining students’ intellectual control. The pedagogical implications include process-based learning, assessment of both the product and the writing process, and transparency in the use of technology in accordance with institutional regulations. This study concludes that artificial intelligence should be positioned as a supporting tool, not a substitute for reasoning and academic responsibility. The strategies formulated are conceptual in nature and require empirical testing within the context of Indonesian language learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnadi, A., Aslan, A., & Vandika, A. Y. (2024). PENGGUNAAN KECERDASAN BUATAN UNTUK PERSONALISASI PENGALAMAN BELAJAR. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Kearifan Lokal, 4(5), Article 5.

Becan, C., & Çeber, B. (2025). How technology readiness influences behavioral and purchasing intention: Serial multiple mediating role of attitude toward AI and AI-driven consumer chatbot experience. Digital Transformation and Society, 5(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-04-2025-0082

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024a). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024b). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024c). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.

Firdaus, F., Iqbal, M., Sirait, W., Mulyani, L. N., Hidayat, R., & Putri, V. M. (2026). BUKU AJAR KECERDASAN BUATAN: Panduan Praktis dari Algoritma, Deployment hingga Etika di Era Industri 4.0. Serasi Media Teknologi.

Herani, R., & Angela, J. (2024). Navigating ChatGPT: Catalyst or challenge for Indonesian youth in digital entrepreneurship? Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 17(3), 602–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-05-2024-0181

Kasman, R. A., Burhan, & Hb, A. M. (2025). Peran dan Tantangan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) dalam Pendidikan Tinggi: Implementasi dan Implikasi Etis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.62388/jpdp.v5i1.523

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Liriwati, F. Y. (2023). Transformasi Kurikulum; Kecerdasan Buatan untuk Membangun Pendidikan yang Relevan di Masa Depan. IHSAN : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.61

Lo, C. K. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Luke, A. (2012). Critical Literacy: Foundational Notes. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324

Nasution, W. R., & Aslan, A. (2025). INTEGRASI MATA PELAJARAN CODING DAN KECERDASAN BUATAN (AI) DALAM KURIKULUM SEKOLAH DASAR SEBAGAI UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN ABAD KE-21. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY DEDICATION, 4(4), 225–236.

Rahmawati, A., Amirah, S. N., & Wijaya, N. (2025). Integrasi Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia: Peluang, Tantangan, dan Kerangka Implementasi. Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 6(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.35957/jtsi.v6i1.11329

Safrudin, M. Z. (2026). PEMANFAATAN KECERDASAN BUATAN (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE) OLEH GURU DALAM PERENCANAAN PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM (Studi Kasus di SD Islamic International School PSM Kediri) [Undergraduate, UIN Syekh Wasil Kediri]. https://doi.org/10/22201161_bab2.pdf

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Walliman, N., & Walliman, N. (2021). Research Methods: The Basics (3 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003141693

Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The Affordances and Contradictions of AI-Generated Text for Writers of English as a Second or Foreign Language (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4404380). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404380

Williamson, B. (2024). The Social life of AI in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00342-5

Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral Reading and the Nature of Expertise: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102

UNESCO. (2023, September 7). UNESCO: Governments must quickly regulate generative AI in schools.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-02