INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIMODAL LEARNING MEDIA: A LITERATURE STUDY ON THE INTEGRATION OF PRINT, AUDIOVISUAL, AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF 21ST CENTURY LEARNING PROCESSES

Authors

  • Zulvia Trinova Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang Author
  • Mowafg Masuwd University of Zawia, Libya Author
  • Aslan Aslan Universitas Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17769360

Keywords:

learning innovation, multimodal media, media integration, educational technology, 21st century learning

Abstract

This study aims to systematically examine the concepts, theories, and practices of multimodal learning media innovation as a strategy for improving the quality of 21st-century learning. This study uses a library research method by examining various scientific sources such as journals, proceedings, and textbooks that discuss the integration of print, audiovisual, and computer technology media. The results of the study show that multimodal learning is based on the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning and the social semiotics approach, which emphasises the importance of combining various modes of communication in constructing meaningful understanding. The integration of print, audiovisual, and computer technology media produces pedagogical synergy that can strengthen motivation, improve cognitive effectiveness, and support collaborative and independent learning. The application of multimodality in learning media design has been proven to support the development of 21st-century competencies such as critical thinking, creativity, communication, and digital literacy. Thus, multimodal learning media can become a strategic foundation for the renewal of a modern education system that is adaptive to technological developments and the learning needs of students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alonso, F., Lopez, G., Manrique, D., & Viñals, F. (2005). An Instructional Model for Web-Based e-Learning Education with a Blended Learning Process Approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x

Aslan, A., & Arifudin, O. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE LOVE CURRICULUM IN ISLAMIC EDUCATION AS TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION THAT CHANGES THE PERSPECTIVE AND ATTITUDE OF STUDENTS: A THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL LITERATURE REVIEW. Proceedings of the Indonesian National Seminar, 3(1), 83–94.

Aslan, A., & Sidabutar, H. (2025). APPLICATION OF PIAGET’S THEORY IN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3 (1), Article 1.

Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107673

Bower, M., & Hedberg, J. G. (2010). Blended learning and online tutoring: A good practice guide. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26 (3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13639-011-0019-5

Caroline, C., & Aslan, A. (2025). Improving Accessibility to Education through Technology: Challenges and Solutions in Developing. Educational Scientific Journal, 11 (1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37567/jie.v11i1.3696

Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2011). Graphics for Learning: Proven Guidelines for Planning, Designing, and Evaluating Visuals in Training Materials. Pfeiffer.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the Science of Instruction. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239082

Dede, C. (2009). Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning. Science, 323 (5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311

Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 170–198.

Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. Proceedings of the Indonesian National Seminar on, 3 (2), Article 2.

Firmansyah, F., & Aslan, A. (2025a). EFFECTIVENESS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE. INJOSEDU: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND EDUCATION, 2 (2), Article 2.

Firmansyah, F., & Aslan, A. (2025b). THE RELEVANCE OF STEAM EDUCATION IN PREPARING 21ST CENTURY STUDENTS. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3 (3), Article 3.

Fitriyanti, F., & Aslan, A. (2025). THE ROLE OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN REDUCING LEARNING DISPARITIES AMONG STUDENTS FROM DIFFERENT ECONOMIC BACKGROUNDS. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 5 (3), Article 3.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00037-6

Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for Peer-Reviewed Journals. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 52–57.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking. Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v12n01_02

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866228

Judijanto, L., & Aslan, A. (2025). ADDRESSING DISPARITIES IN MULTISECTORAL EDUCATION: LEARNING FROM AN INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE REVIEW. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 5 (1), Article 1.

Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the Benefits and Challenges of Using Audience Response Systems: A Review of the Literature. Computers & Education, 53 (3), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.002

Komari, K., & Aslan, A. (2025). Exploring the Optimal of EarlyA Literature . Educational Scientific Journal, 11 (1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37567/jie.v11i1.3605

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Arnold. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203999289

Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203304044

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125082

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38 (1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. U.S. Department of Education. https://doi.org/10.1037/e527352012-001

Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32 (1–2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021812.66958.1e

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual Coding Theory: Retrospect and Current Status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45 (3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295

Pongpalilu, F., & Aslan, A. (2025). THE ROLE OF TEACHERS AS AGENTS OF CHANGE IN SHAPING STUDENTS’ CREATIVITY, CHARACTER, AND SOCIAL SENSITIVITY: A LITERATURE REVIEW. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2 (11), Article 11.

Pugu, M. R., & Aslan, A. (2025). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN LITERACY AND NUMERACY ACHIEVEMENT: A CRITICAL REVIEW. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 5 (1), Article 1.

Purike, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIGITAL AND TRADITIONAL LEARNING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 5 (1), Article 1.

Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877194

Rokhmawati, Z., Aslan, A., & Farchan, A. (2025). Technological Innovation in Distance Education: A Literature.. Ilmiah Edukatif, 11 (1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37567/jie.v11i1.3735

Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203102296

Salvatore, J., & Marek, M. (2017). Integrating Print and Digital Media for Enhanced Learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 26 (3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1313472

Saputra, H., Usman, S., Sakka, A. R., & Aslan, A. (2024). The Effect of Using Learning Media on Learning Motivation About Creed and Morals at Mas Ushuluddin Singkawang. IJGIE (International Journal of Graduate of Islamic Education), 6 (1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37567/ijgie.v6i1.3698

Schraw, G., & Olafson, L. (2005). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30

Sudarmo, S., Arifin, A., Pattiasina, P. J., Wirawan, V., & Aslan, A. (2021). The future of instruction media in Indonesian education: Systematic review. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1302–1311.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist, 38

Wilson, B. G. (1996). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Educational Technology Publications.

Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. J., & Nunamaker, J. F. Jr. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43 (1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30