THE RELEVANCE OF ISLAMIC EDUCATION MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES TO MODERN MANAGEMENT PARADIGMS: A LITERATURE STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF INDONESIAN EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17769322Keywords:
Islamic Education Management, value-based leadership, Modern Management, Transformational Leadership, Distributed Leadership, Sharia-Based Leadership, Indonesian EducationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the relevance of Islamic education management principles to modern management paradigms in the context of Indonesian education, employing a qualitative approach based on systematic literature reviews. Islamic management principles such as amanah, shura, 'adl, and ihsan were found to have a significant contribution in building school leadership that has integrity, participation, and is morally oriented. Literature analysis also shows that these values have a strong conceptual fit with modern management theories, including transformational leadership, distributed leadership, and value-based leadership. Despite the challenges of integration influenced by differences in normative and pragmatic orientations, the study's findings indicate that the two paradigms can be combined to form a hybrid leadership model that is relevant to the character of Indonesian education. This research makes a theoretical contribution by offering an integrative perspective that broadens the understanding of value-based leadership, while also opening up opportunities for more empirical and practical follow-up research. Practically, the results of this study provide strategic recommendations for school leaders, educational institutions, and policymakers on developing ethical, adaptive, and contextually relevant educational governance.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. (2018). Islamic leadership in education: Concepts and applications. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 6(2), 145–160.
Azra, A. (2020). Islamic education in Indonesia: Historical development and contemporary issues. Studia Islamika, 27(1), 1–28.
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(3), 359–372.
Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24.
Hashim, R. (2019). Ethical frameworks in Islamic educational management. International Journal of Educational Reform, 28(4), 310–329.
Rahman, F., & Shah, S. (2021). Sharia-Based Leadership: Implications for Educational Administration. Journal of Management and Organization, 27(5), 789–804.
Shah, S. (2022). Values-based leadership in education: Global perspectives. Educational Review, 74(2), 165–181.
Sufean, H., & Ibrahim, N. (2020). Islamic-oriented educational administration: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 683–697.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Information Science, 45(3), 234–247.
Mulyasa, E. (2018). Principal leadership in improving the quality of education. International Journal of Educational Science and Research, 8(2), 1–10.
Sagala, S. (2017). The role of instructional leadership in educational development in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Educational Policy and Reform, 2(1), 45–53.
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2017). Leading professional learning with impact. School Leadership & Management, 37(5), 453–466.
Bezzina, C. (2018). Moral purpose and shared leadership: Learning from successful schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(2), 164–183.
Ciulla, J. B. (2014). Ethics is the heart of leadership. Praeger.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.
